It was another steamy Tuesday night in Houston. So, with the glitterati in Aspen, the kids whining at
home, and little else for entertainment, hundreds of Houstonians chose to spend their precious weekday evening attending.... another Mayoral Forum!
I'm only sort of kidding. After all, the candidates have participated in more than twenty forums, and we're not even to September yet. They must be tired. Nonetheless, yours truly walked over to Alley Theater, and joined others for the Young Leaders Mayoral Forum. This is of course, a non-partisan race. By now though, everyone knows where their politics leanings are among the candidates.
The format was simple. The four candidates were on the stage with a moderator, asking a series of pre-determined questions. They were timed for their answers. The questions focused on many of the familiar issues.
The first questions focused on economic development in the city. Roy Morales, the only Republican on stage, focused on cutting taxes and complaining that Houston currently has an operating deficit. Gene Locke, who is a Democrat but has many Republican supporters, talked about supporting tax abatements for businesses. He emphasized operating a business friendly environment. Annise Parker talked about creating a "cabinet level" position relating to bringing businesses into Houston. Peter Brown said he wanted to set up an economic development team, which made think: "What about the Greater Houston Partnership, aren't they suppose to help the city with economic development?"
There was then a bizarre request for the candidates to answer a question a la the late sales man Billy Mays, thank goodness none of the candidates did that. We're trying to find a Mayor, not buy a cleaning product.
There were some questioning about helping the school system. Annise Parker went first. She talked about creating another "cabinet" level position to help the 17 school districts in Houston. What was interesting here is that Parker, who has been elected city wide several times, ticked off her facts like clock work. Subsequently, every other candidate mentioned "17 school districts" in their answers. I wonder how many of them would have known there were 17 school districts in Houston had Parker not gone first? We'll never know.
On the question of illegal immigration and enforcement, all the candidates gave fairly thoughtful answers. The basic line here is that all will want people questioned on their immigration status if they are arrested. However, they do not want police officers on the streets to racially profile. What struck me in this line of questioning was the fact that Roy Morales really toned down his talking points. Instead of railing against illegal immigration as he has done in the past, Morales talked about being a victim of racial profiling as a child. Definitely a different tone.
There were also questions about METRO, traffic, sports stadiums, and a few other issues. Most were pretty standard, and no major surprises. I guess after doing two dozen forums, most of the candidates got their answers down pretty solid. Overall, Gene Locke and Annise Parker were the most prepared. They knew their issues, their talking points, and even tried to stay within the time limits. It's obvious they've done a lot of prep work for these kind of things. Peter Brown, who is known to talk for a while and often stray off point, was noticeably better than in past performances. He still went a bit long, but managed to answer the questions fairly to the point. Roy Morales started off a bit nervous, his voice was higher pitched than normal. However, he calmed down a few questions in and sounded fine. I was just surprised at how he seemed to move a little more toward the center on some of his answers.
The reality is, this is all inside baseball stuff. All these forums serve the organizations that are putting them on more than they serve the candidates. After dozens of forums, they are still reaching a relatively small, and already engaged crowd. I've seen some of the same people over and over again. To really make an impact, they need to buy radio and TV time, as well as send out lots of mail pieces. Their campaigns know this, of course, and have privately admitted to me as much. The question is, who will buy ad time first? That's when the big, move-the-needle campaign begins. Until then, it's off to another forum.
Recent Comments